Before he wrote the recent book The Brain from Inside Out, the neuroscientist György Buzsáki previewed some of the arguments in a paper written 20 years ago (“The brain-cognitive behavior problem: a retrospective”), now finally published. The principal focus of the paper is the relationship between neuroscience and psychology. The direction in which that research had proceeded, and continues now, is, in his view, fundamentally misguided. Building on the critique, Buzsáki presents arguments for an “inside-out” approach, wherein the study of neurobiological objects has primacy over using psychological concepts to study the brain, and should, in fact, give rise to them. We argue that he is too pessimistic, and actually not quite right, about how the relation between cognition and neuroscience can be studied. Second, we are not in agreement with the normative recommendation of how to proceed: a predominantly brain first, implementation-driven research agenda. Finally, we raise concerns about the philosophical underpinning of the research program he advances. Buzsáki’s perspective merits careful examination, and we suggest that it can be linked in a productive way to ongoing research, aligning his inside-out approach with current work that yields convincing accounts of mind and brain.
You may also like
Getting in the Groove: Why samba makes everyone want...
Estimating the pace of change
April 26, 2022Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Prefrontal cortex involved in conscious vision
April 26, 2022Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Out of rhythm: Compromised precision of theta-gamma...
April 26, 2022Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Near-natural, fractal architecture promotes well-being
April 26, 2022Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Locus coeruleus integrity is related to tau burden and...
April 26, 2022Max Planck Institute for Human Development