The neurobiology of sentence production has been largely understudied compared to the neurobiology of sentence comprehension, due to difficulties with experimental control and motion-related artifacts in neuroimaging. We studied the neural response to constituents of increasing size and specifically focused on the similarities and differences in the production and comprehension of the same stimuli. Participants had to either produce or listen to stimuli in a gradient of constituent size based on a visual prompt. Larger constituent sizes engaged the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG) and middle temporal gyrus (LMTG) extending to inferior parietal areas in both production and comprehension, confirming that the neural resources for syntactic encoding and decoding are largely overlapping. An ROI analysis in LIFG and LMTG also showed that production elicited larger responses to constituent size than comprehension and that the LMTG was more engaged in comprehension than production, while the LIFG was more engaged in production than comprehension. Finally, increasing constituent size was characterized by later BOLD peaks in comprehension but earlier peaks in production. These results show that syntactic encoding and parsing engage overlapping areas, but there are asymmetries in the engagement of the language network due to the specific requirements of production and comprehension.
You may also like
Getting in the Groove: Why samba makes everyone want...
Estimating the pace of change
April 26, 2022Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Prefrontal cortex involved in conscious vision
April 26, 2022Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Out of rhythm: Compromised precision of theta-gamma...
April 26, 2022Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Near-natural, fractal architecture promotes well-being
April 26, 2022Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Locus coeruleus integrity is related to tau burden and...
April 26, 2022Max Planck Institute for Human Development