The timing of acoustic events is central to human speech and music. Tempo tends to be slower in aesthetic contexts: rates in poetic speech and music are slower than non-poetic, running speech. We tested whether a general aesthetic preference for slower rates can account for this, using birdsong as a stimulus: It structurally resembles human sequences but is unbiased by their production or processing constraints. When listeners selected the birdsong playback tempo that was most pleasing, they showed no bias towards any range of note rates. However, upon hearing a novel stimulus, listeners rapidly formed a robust, implicit memory of its temporal properties, and developed a stimulus-specific preference for the memorized tempo. Interestingly, tempo perception in birdsong stimuli was strongly determined by the individual, internal preferences for rates of 1–2Hz. This suggests that processing complex sound sequences relies on a default time window, while aesthetic appreciation appears flexible, experience-based, and not determined by absolute event rates.
You may also like
Should I Stay or Should I Go?
March 24, 2021Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
How the brain teaches itself to see
March 16, 2021Max Planck Institute for Brain Research
Cannibal worms spare their own brood
February 1, 2021Center for Advanced European Studies and Research
The role that feedback plays in learning
January 29, 2021Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
When the Mario Brothers feel dizzy
January 29, 2021Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
See where the journey goes
January 29, 2021Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics